4 ms·
I was more referring to you saying you would skirt the issue rather than using the term disabled or handicapped. If there is an alternative word that is less of
by GhostVII 7y ago
I was more referring to you saying you would skirt the issue rather than using the term disabled or handicapped. If there is an alternative word that is less offensive, of course there is no problem with using it if it means the same thing.
- VBprogrammer 7y agoAh, I see what you mean. No, the issue I intended to skirt was choosing the most appropriate label, not the whole issue that JS may make websites less accessible.