2 ms·
> What do you mean by this? Why would that be unusual? I think philwelch meant that it would be an unusual suggestion because the historical record doesn't sup
by JadeNB 7y ago
> What do you mean by this? Why would that be unusual?
I think philwelch meant that it would be an unusual suggestion because the historical record doesn't support the existence of this particular romantic relationship, not that it would be unusual for two men to have (or to have had) a romantic relationship.
- philwelch 7y agoIt would also be unusual for either Jobs or Perot personally, and would probably be unusual in the context of an investor/executive professional relationship as well, though one never knows for sure.