3 ms·
There isn't a 1-size-fits-all solution to this type of situation. Giving the company a reasonable time[1] to fix it is a good guideline to start with, but deter
by pdkl95 7y ago
There isn't a 1-size-fits-all solution to this type of situation. Giving the company a reasonable time[1] to fix it is a good guideline to start with, but determining the best approach to use requires making several judgment calls.
Is the exploit already being used in the wild? Should affected users be doing something asap to protect themselves? How quickly could someone transform your disclosure into something malicious? How much risk are we forcing the users to bear while we wait for a self-imposed arbitrary time limit to expire. Is there an actual benefit to be gained by delaying public disclosure? (Is the company using the time responsibly to implement a fix, or are they denying the problem exists?
Handling a public disclosure meas adapting to the specific risks of the situation.
[1] I would say 30 days is more appropriate, with the option to delay the public announcement if the company has handled the situation well and is working on the fix, but needs more time for a legitimate technical reason.