3 ms·
From what I understand, records show he worked at Los Alamos, but not his role, so he could have been a janitor for all we know. We also know he didn't actuall
by carlosdp 7y ago
From what I understand, records show he worked at Los Alamos, but not his role, so he could have been a janitor for all we know.
We also know he didn't actually go to MIT like he claims, and the way he explains the "alien tech" are not the way a real engineer would talk about these things. So I'd say definitely a crackpot...
- lawnchair_larry 7y agoHow do we know that he didn’t go to MIT? And what does he say that is inconsistent with how a real engineer would talk about something?
- tenfivewest 7y agoThere’s a video of him being asked who his professors were at Caltech and MIT. He names two people, one was from a community college and a high school I think. And he doesn’t explain the science in a detailed or verbose way.
- lawnchair_larry 7y agoNeither of those explanations are very satisfying. At best they might make the story suspicious, but that doesn’t seem like enough to say we know something.
- carlosdp 7y agoI mean, the claim that he worked at a secret lab on alien tech should be the suspicious part... The burden on proof is on him to prove the story is real, not on others to disprove the stuff he makes up.
- lawnchair_larry 7y agoSure, but that’s besides the point. Once parent comment asserts a fact about a specific detail, they now have an obligation to cite the evidence for that particular fact. Lazar’s obligation to prove his own claims is a legitimate but separate issue.
- carlosdp 7y agoHe was registered at some vocational school is Los Alamos at the time he said he attended MIT, besides the fact that MIT says they've never heard of him. He says shit like "the gravity orb was activated by a an electric pressure", which is just nonsense.