Normally, charity in an interpretation means that there's a way that it could be taken where it makes sense. I don't think that's the case for this comment. Th

Normally, charity in an interpretation means that there's a way that it could be taken where it makes sense. I don't think that's the case for this comment. The most charitable interpretation I have is that the original poster is a paid shill -- in other words, they're bright enough to realize what they're saying is idiotic, but they're just doing a job to put food on the table. It'd take some evidence to sway me to that view.