3 ms·
Couldn't they offer an app with no in-app "buy a subscription" option and avoid paying that Apple tax? I guess added value for existing subscribers isn't very
by tomjakubowski 7y ago
Couldn't they offer an app with no in-app "buy a subscription" option and avoid paying that Apple tax? I guess added value for existing subscribers isn't very appealing on its own.
- syshum 7y agoApple has come down hard on devs attempting to do that.
- scarface74 7y agoThere is an existence proof that that isn’t the case. Spotify, Netflix, Sling, and DirecTVNow are all in the App Store and none of them allow subscriptions from within the App Store.
- syshum 7y agoThat is simply proof of selective enforcement. your examples have HUGE preexisting User Base, should apple ban them it would have a real effect on Apple Adoption rates They are big enough to make apple bow, other apps are not like that
- scarface74 7y agoSo I guess Linux Academy is also big enough to make “Apple Bow” since you have to subscribe outside of the store? There isn’t a requirement to make subscriptions only available in the store.