4 ms·
> evidence of continuance was weak That's a funny way of saying that we had interviews from the general that ordered the destruction of the program that all WM
by ndarwincorn 7y ago
> evidence of continuance was weak
That's a funny way of saying that we had interviews from the general that ordered the destruction of the program that all WMD had been destroyed after the Iran-Iraq war.[1]
I'd add that counter-evidence of continuance was strong if you're going to include that at all.
[1] http://www.cnn.com/WORLD/9509/iraq_defector/kamel_transcript/index.html http://www.cnn.com/WORLD/9509/iraq_defector/kamel_transcript...
- gpm 7y agoI'm not sure why you would consider a interview with an Iraqi General strong evidence. Either way while I agree that the US claims were fabricated, he was also demonstrably incorrect in claiming that there were none https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2014/10/14/world/middleeast/us-casualties-of-iraq-chemical-weapons.html https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2014/10/14/world/middlee...