It's 2nd circuit (Connecticut, New York, and Vermont) which seems to be relatively uncontroversial, unanimous decision by 3 judges, 2 Bush 1 Obama appointees.

It's 2nd circuit (Connecticut, New York, and Vermont) which seems to be relatively uncontroversial, unanimous decision by 3 judges, 2 Bush 1 Obama appointees. """ We do conclude, however, that the First Amendment does not permit a public official who utilizes a social media account for all manner of official purposes to exclude persons from an otherwise‐open online dialogue because they expressed views with which the official disagrees. """ Seems pretty narrow and it appears that a public official would still be able to block trolls and spammers. This all combined makes me think that SCOTUS will be unlikely to take this case. edit -- the "otherwise-open" part also suggest that posting a message where all replies are blocked would also be acceptable (does twitter has this functionality? I have it blackholed so no idea...)