3 ms·
FWIW... I bet you could power the camera, get a still frame at 60fps, shut it down, and not see the led come on. It would be 1/60, 16ms plus or minus the amount
by SlowRobotAhead 7y ago
FWIW... I bet you could power the camera, get a still frame at 60fps, shut it down, and not see the led come on. It would be 1/60, 16ms plus or minus the amount of overhead needed, plus autofocus and exposure correction might make it impractical, but it’s definitely not a bulletproof fix.
- heavenlyblue 7y agoApple could simply make the camera take 1 second to activate.
- SlowRobotAhead 7y agoSlow spool up embedded devices... we’re moving backwards :)
- heavenlyblue 7y agoIf Google Calendar thinks it’s OK to set a 500ms animation on opacity for event edit dialog - then it doesn’t seem like a 1 sec spooling for a webcam is too much :)
- cstejerean 7y agoHow much would you bet?
- SlowRobotAhead 7y agoConsidering I have a device here that has an I2C camera and in firmware I can turn it on and off at right around 25ms, I’d consider betting quite a bit. Instead of being snarky, how about you explain why this isn’t possible. Even if it was 100ms almost no one would catch that.
- cstejerean 7y agoI’m not being snarky, and we’re not talking about some random device you have. We’re talking about the camera on a Mac. The bet is that you can’t turn it on and off so fast as to be un-noticeable because there is a noticeable delay between that light turning on and getting an image from that camera. So I’ll gladly take the other side of that bet.