6 ms·

I get "You cannot use this version of the application Kod with this version of Mac Os X." - ???

by macmac 16y ago

steveklabnik 16y ago
Are you on 10.6? If not, you're out of luck.
- babo 16y ago
  Fine for a free application, a wise decision.
  - steveklabnik 16y ago
    Fine for any application; nobody can dictate which platforms anyone must support and which they can't. 10.6 is much nicer than 10.5 on a bunch of levels. It's slightly annoying now, but will pay off in the future.
    - meric 16y ago
      If you say so. :( That it will be worth the wait till I skip 10.6 and upgrade straight to Lion. Was looking forward to using something shiny.
      - steveklabnik 16y ago
        Why'd you skip 10.6? It was $30.
        getsat 16y ago
        And also a HUGE improvement in a lot of different areas! Speed, especially.
        meric 16y ago
        I'd just never gotten around to it... Nothing I used (except Kod and new Smultron) really required 10.6.
        Stormbringer 16y ago
        It is much buggier, frequent crashes of Safari, iTunes and Mail for instance
        sharednothing 16y ago
        Not sure why you are getting down-voted. I have 2 MBPs. One is s ~3 year old running 10.5 and his baby sister running 10.6. This is entirely subjective per my experience: - the 10.5 'feels' more responsive. - the beachball is a very frequent event in the 10.6, specially Safari, sometimes even when switching tabs which is quite annoying. - I haven't rebooted the old MBP in months. Sitting pretty on my desk. The new one has frozen few times and occasionally I feel the need to put it out of its misery myself.
        ubernostrum 16y ago
        There's no such thing as a trivial OS upgrade, and so long as 10.5 is supported and runs the stuff I need to run, I don't have a compelling reason to go to the trouble of upgrading.
        steveklabnik 16y ago
        ... except some software that's 10.6 only? ;)
        fredoliveira 16y ago
        You'll have to excuse me, but you're wrong. I mean, sure, it is an OS upgrade. But there's no real "trouble" (it takes about 20 minutes and a few clicks) and there's definitely compelling reasons to upgrade (including running 10.6 specific software). One pressing reason to upgrade: 64bit. Another one: cocoa finder. Also, faster and smaller. Seriously, I know people who have a reason not to upgrade. You don't seem to be one of those people. Those people are on worse operating systems than you are.
        ubernostrum 16y ago
        OK, tell you what: you come over to my place, run the upgrade, then fix all my dev stuff (combination of macports and non-macports) that'll break. Seriously, I've done this before and I know what's gonna be involved. But if you want to sit back and tell me how little "trouble" I'll have, you can do it for me.
protomyth 16y ago
from the info.plist <key>LSMinimumSystemVersion</key> <string>10.6.0</string> <key>LSMinimumSystemVersionByArchitecture</key> <dict> <key>x86_64</key> <string>10.6</string> </dict>

I get "You cannot use this version of the application Kod with this version of Mac Os X." - ???

by macmac 16y ago

I get "You cannot use this version of the application Kod with this version of Mac Os X." - ???

steveklabnik 16y ago

Are you on 10.6? If not, you're out of luck.

babo 16y ago
Fine for a free application, a wise decision.
- steveklabnik 16y ago
  Fine for any application; nobody can dictate which platforms anyone must support and which they can't. 10.6 is much nicer than 10.5 on a bunch of levels. It's slightly annoying now, but will pay off in the future.
  - meric 16y ago
    If you say so. :( That it will be worth the wait till I skip 10.6 and upgrade straight to Lion. Was looking forward to using something shiny.
    - steveklabnik 16y ago
      Why'd you skip 10.6? It was $30.
      - getsat 16y ago
        And also a HUGE improvement in a lot of different areas! Speed, especially.
        meric 16y ago
        I'd just never gotten around to it... Nothing I used (except Kod and new Smultron) really required 10.6.
        Stormbringer 16y ago
        It is much buggier, frequent crashes of Safari, iTunes and Mail for instance
        sharednothing 16y ago
        Not sure why you are getting down-voted. I have 2 MBPs. One is s ~3 year old running 10.5 and his baby sister running 10.6. This is entirely subjective per my experience: - the 10.5 'feels' more responsive. - the beachball is a very frequent event in the 10.6, specially Safari, sometimes even when switching tabs which is quite annoying. - I haven't rebooted the old MBP in months. Sitting pretty on my desk. The new one has frozen few times and occasionally I feel the need to put it out of its misery myself.
      - ubernostrum 16y ago
        There's no such thing as a trivial OS upgrade, and so long as 10.5 is supported and runs the stuff I need to run, I don't have a compelling reason to go to the trouble of upgrading.
        steveklabnik 16y ago
        ... except some software that's 10.6 only? ;)
        fredoliveira 16y ago
        You'll have to excuse me, but you're wrong. I mean, sure, it is an OS upgrade. But there's no real "trouble" (it takes about 20 minutes and a few clicks) and there's definitely compelling reasons to upgrade (including running 10.6 specific software). One pressing reason to upgrade: 64bit. Another one: cocoa finder. Also, faster and smaller. Seriously, I know people who have a reason not to upgrade. You don't seem to be one of those people. Those people are on worse operating systems than you are.
        ubernostrum 16y ago
        OK, tell you what: you come over to my place, run the upgrade, then fix all my dev stuff (combination of macports and non-macports) that'll break. Seriously, I've done this before and I know what's gonna be involved. But if you want to sit back and tell me how little "trouble" I'll have, you can do it for me.

protomyth 16y ago

from the info.plist <key>LSMinimumSystemVersion</key> <string>10.6.0</string> <key>LSMinimumSystemVersionByArchitecture</key> <dict> <key>x86_64</key> <string>10.6</string> </dict>