3 ms·

No, because Twitter itself isn't the government. For everyone playing at home: When the Government (personified by Trump in this case) limits your ability to e

by moate 7y ago

No, because Twitter itself isn't the government. For everyone playing at home: When the Government (personified by Trump in this case) limits your ability to express your freedom of speech (represented by blocking you on twitter) they're violating the first Amendment. When a private citizen or corporation does it, you're probably just violating their ToS.

geggam 7y ago
Arguably then every govt employee is bound by this.
- tareqak 7y ago
  Yeah and if they have decision-making power that affects their constituents then they probably should be bound by this ruling.
- sdinsn 7y ago
  Every government employee that uses their twitter account as an official communication tool is bound by this
deleted 7y ago
[deleted]