4 ms·
Additionally, apt also packages "ruby-1.9.1" which actually installs Ruby 1.9.2. More evidence that apt is fundamentally broken when it comes to Ruby package ma
by ryanbigg 16y ago
Additionally, apt also packages "ruby-1.9.1" which actually installs Ruby 1.9.2. More evidence that apt is fundamentally broken when it comes to Ruby package management.
- regularfry 16y agohttp://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2010/08/18/ruby-1-9.2-released/#label-6 http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2010/08/18/ruby-1-9.2-relea... doesn't help.
- viraptor 16y agoNo. Apt works and does not enforce what versions you use and what you call them. Debian policies are another thing. But I wouldn't call stuff fundamentally broken that quickly. Once you actually get into packaging - versioning and dependencies stop being that simple thing really. Especially if you want more than one person to use your package in a stable environment. Also "In the name of this package, `1.9.1' indicates the Ruby library compatibility version. This package currently provides the `1.9.2' branch of Ruby, which is compatible with the `1.9.1' branch." (http://packages.debian.org/sid/ruby1.9.1 http://packages.debian.org/sid/ruby1.9.1)