3 ms·
They were probably also against Window's UAC popups.
by prophesi 7y ago
They were probably also against Window's UAC popups.
- komali2 7y agoEveryone I knew was against UAC popups, including security professionals. They were likened to California Prop 65 warnings: so prolific as to be ignored, and arguably causing more harm than good, because just as apparently since EVERYTHING causes cancer one can't make decisions about avoiding things that actually do, so to does EVERYTHING trigger a UAC popup and so who gives a fuck, one more thing to quickly ignore and click through.
- chrisfinazzo 7y agoUAC is the correct idea (elevated user privilege levels), but implemented in the worst way possible. As I understand it, things have gotten MUCH less annoying since Vista, but it still left a bad taste in people's mouths.
- syn0byte 7y agoIt pops up with exactly as much frequency as a normal user account in most Posix-like systems would require "su" of one form or another. For exactly the same reasons. It's just expected behavior for those systems, but completely unacceptable for Windows. And we wonder why Microsoft sucks so bad at securing Windows.
- munchbunny 7y agoIt was the collision of Microsoft trying to limit "run as admin" and Windows developers taking users running as admin for granted for too long. There had to be a period of pain as "if it ain't broken don't fix it" developers got around to not asking for unnecessary permissions. These days you mostly see the prompt when you're installing or updating an app, which makes a lot of sense. What I mean is, this is Microsoft's fault so far as users got in the habit of running in admin in the first place, but I doubt you would've been able to do better given where Microsoft was with its software ecosystem going into Vista.
- prophesi 7y agoYeah, that makes sense. And I can't think of any way to accomplish it better :/ Every app you install can potentially cause computer 'cancer'. As a sister comment mentions, it's akin to warning the user whenever they run a command under su/sudo.