No, that's still not really a good way of looking at it--you are assuming those things are mutually exclusive when they aren't. I would call myself an agnostic

No, that's still not really a good way of looking at it--you are assuming those things are mutually exclusive when they aren't. I would call myself an agnostic atheist. I don't believe in gods, but I have to admit there's no way to prove they don't exist. I've met people who consider themselves agnostic theists--they think a god probably exists but they admit they cannot prove it.