3 ms·
Not defending Samsung, but it doesn't seem like they're redistributing your code under the Apache license, rather the rest of the project under that license. In
by laken 7y ago
Not defending Samsung, but it doesn't seem like they're redistributing your code under the Apache license, rather the rest of the project under that license. In the COPYING file they have your license in there, under the files that appear to be yours, as an exception of being under the Apache license. https://github.com/Samsung/uJVM/blob/master/COPYING https://github.com/Samsung/uJVM/blob/master/COPYING
So this means that in the example you shared, you could just link them to the /COPYING and say that you'd still have to get those files re-licensed under your terms, as it's still not free.
- dmitrygr 7y agoThey claim their project was Apache license. How can something be Apache license if its very core is not?