3 ms·
So, monoculture or not these trees are going to sequester carbon. Preserving natural forests is ideal, but these are areas that weren’t forested before this pro
by gdubs 7y ago
So, monoculture or not these trees are going to sequester carbon. Preserving natural forests is ideal, but these are areas that weren’t forested before this project. Obviously if they’re cleared and / or burned, a lot of that carbon will go back into the atmosphere. Therefore, creating systems people will be happy maintaining and living with for centuries isn’t a superficial concern. For an idea of what that might look like, think of the olive tree agroforestry hillsides of Italy that have existed for centuries.
The tropical “homegarden” — similar to the permaculture idea of a “food forest” — shows enormous promise for high annual and lifetime carbon sequestration potential. They can be beautiful, productive systems that have the added benefit of producing food and sustenance.
- mmaurizi 7y agoI would assume the intention is to clear them once they mature - you get the most carbon sequestration if you cut the trees down once they mature and use them to build things and then replant. Obviously burning is counterproductive, but once you turn the trees into houses the carbon will be out of the atmosphere for a very long time.