3 ms·
What's your point? Keep in mind the TSA's own internal testing has found them to be largely ineffective.[1][2] [1]https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaelgoldstein
by beepboopbeep 7y ago
What's your point? Keep in mind the TSA's own internal testing has found them to be largely ineffective.[1][2]
[1]https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaelgoldstein/2017/11/09/tsa-misses-70-of-fake-weapons-but-thats-an-improvement/ https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaelgoldstein/2017/11/09/tsa...
[2]https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/investigation-breaches-us-airports-allowed-weapons-through-n367851 https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/investigation-breaches-...
- ryanmercer 7y agoMy point? My point is there were 3,656 less loaded firearms in airplanes last year in the United States than there would have been without TSA, and 20-something thousand 'dangerous devices' total kept off the flights. That's 3,656 less chances of a hijacking, or accidental discharges depressurizing a cabin and causing an emergency landing. Really, the number of chances is likely higher than that considering many of those instances likely came with one or more connecting flights.
- smcg 7y agoYou can still catch those firearms with a simple metal detector. You don't need device searches or indefinite detention.