4 ms·

The point remains that crime/radicalization can occur over any site/medium. Banning a site or medium seems heavy-handed unless it exists expressly to facilitat

The point remains that crime/radicalization can occur over any site/medium. Banning a site or medium seems heavy-handed unless it exists expressly to facilitate crime/radicalization, in my opinion. TOR, for example, has been a known avenue for the spread of child pornography, yet we don't shut it down.

hi5eyes 7y ago
there's more CP on twitter than TOR but nice meme edit: nice meme bc who actually uses TOR? theres so much more cp on surface web liek chans, tumblr used to be a pedos dream, twitter etc. no one uses tor zzz
- RankingMember 7y ago
  Got any proof to back up that statement? There have been numerous FBI busts of Onion sites. For example: https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2016/11/fbi-operated-23-tor-hidden-child-porn-sites-deployed-malware-from-them/ https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2016/11/fbi-operated-23-...
  - hi5eyes 7y ago
    https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/aug/13/twitter-failure-child-pornography https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/aug/13/twitte... https://sputniknews.com/science/201905091074866833-Twitter-370K-Accounts-Suspended-Promoting-Terrorism-2018/ https://sputniknews.com/science/201905091074866833-Twitter-3... you can literally google twitter child porn theres hundreds of threads exposing how these people start group dms baiting kids https://twitter.com/xcutesannex/status/1147456947727282177 https://twitter.com/xcutesannex/status/1147456947727282177 shit in a similar format to this
    - RankingMember 7y ago
      This is a weird quibble. Is your argument simply to let me know I could've used an example with more child porn? Unless you're arguing there's no CP on TOR, my point in the context of the original comment stands.
      - deleted 7y ago
        [deleted]