11 ms·

ShadowFox – Dark Theme for Firefox

67 points by jhabdas 7y ago

hprotagonist 7y ago
A firefox theme i need to brew install just feels ... weird. Is there no other way to do this?
- grenoire 7y ago
  Theming Firefox requires some funky file location detection; ShadowFox does that by executables, which is a little distressing. GitHub project also includes the sources to the distributables, as far as I recall.
- lunchables 7y ago
  Not sure if it has as much coverage, but this was a new one to me that I plan on trying out: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20390261 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20390261
immigrantsheep 7y ago
Why not use the official Firefox Color to change your theme? Doesn't need a separate installer. https://color.firefox.com/ https://color.firefox.com/
- bgeeek 7y ago
  Quite like Solarized themes, so have one that switches from light to dark and vice versa.
- oakslab 7y ago
  I'm using plata theme[1]. The only limitation is that FF Color doesn't apply to about:* pages, whereas SF does. I seldom change my settings anyway, so it's not an issue. [1]: https://gitlab.com/tista500/plata-theme#extra-browser-support https://gitlab.com/tista500/plata-theme#extra-browser-suppor...
- pvinis 7y ago
  I'm in love with color.firefox.com since it was out! So good.
- krilly 7y ago
  Or just write a userChrome.css and dump it in your profile directory. /r/firefoxCSS has the details
  - inops 7y ago
    userChrome.css support will be disabled by default in Firefox 69.[1][2] The user must toggle the "toolkit.legacyUserProfileCustomizations.stylesheet" preference to enable that. Based on the name of that preference, as well as this developer page[3] saying "Support for the userChrome.css file and any of its elements described below are not guaranteed in future versions of Firefox", it seems likely userChrome.css will be dropped in the future. [1] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1541233 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1541233 [2] https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/69.0beta/releasenotes/ https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/69.0beta/releasenotes/ [3] https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Tech/XUL/Tutorial/Modifying_the_Default_Skin https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Tech/XUL/Tu...
    - wlesieutre 7y ago
      That's a bummer, AFAIK it's still required in order to disable to top tab bar row for use with Tree Style Tab or similar. https://hackernoon.com/firefox-hide-tabs-6e1f6cf63d95 https://hackernoon.com/firefox-hide-tabs-6e1f6cf63d95
subbz 7y ago
What's the advantage over the standard dark Firefox theme?
- cerberusss 7y ago
  ShadowFox covers all corner cases. For instance, when opening a new tab, Firefox would flash a crazy huge white page before theming it.
  - sleavey 7y ago
    Seems like this should be fixed in Firefox rather than requiring a theme which executes unsandboxed code on your machine to install itself. I get that people probably want this now, but personally if this bothered me I'd submit a feature request and wait for something more official.
  - baal80spam 7y ago
    >For instance, when opening a new tab, Firefox would flash a crazy huge white page before theming it. I'm using a standard FF dark theme and I don't see anything like that. That's on Win7, FF 67.0.4 (64-bit).
    - remedan 7y ago
      I think this issue was fixed. But it definitely used to exist. I used to use ShadowFox specifically because of it.
    - deleted 7y ago
      [deleted]
    - cerberusss 7y ago
      On Mac, latest version, it still exists for new window and second new tab. Subsequent new tabs seem to be fixed.
  - addicted 7y ago
    I remember this issue but I haven’t seen it lately. Maybe they’ve fixed it?
Krasnol 7y ago
I wish it would leave some sign of it's existence in Firefox. In a few months I wont remember how I did that...
- echohack5 7y ago
  I've run into this problem with all sorts of little things on my Mac, so I use this to automate all those little things I tend to forget about! You're welcome to use it / star / fork. https://github.com/echohack/macbot https://github.com/echohack/macbot
  - Krasnol 7y ago
    No Mac here but thanks for trying :)
MaXtreeM 7y ago
Has anyone found working full dark theme for Firefox mobile on Android? I've tried several available through the standard addons page but they all seem to just change the top bar to some grayish background. I guess the API for change the Side Drop-Down Menu and Settings are not exposed?
- piotrkubisa 7y ago
  The new preview version of Firefox is completely dark.
  - huxflux 7y ago
    Link?A
    - piotrkubisa 7y ago
      Blog post: https://blog.mozilla.org/futurereleases/2019/06/27/reinventing-firefox-for-android-a-preview/ https://blog.mozilla.org/futurereleases/2019/06/27/reinventi... GooglePlay: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=org.mozilla.fenix&hl=en_US https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=org.mozilla.fe... Some screenshots with dark theme: https://www.xda-developers.com/mozilla-transition-users-from-firefox-to-fenix/ https://www.xda-developers.com/mozilla-transition-users-from...
- pz64 7y ago
  im using darkreader which i think , work great
floatingatoll 7y ago
How to spear phish HN readers: 1) Convince them to install crapware* into their browser using basic-but-real functionality. Useful keywords: vi, solarized, dark mode, ad blocker. 2) Wait one month. 3) Ship your C&C backdoor via whatever autoupdate mechanism you put into place and see who phones home. * This tool binary-patches your local system rather than shipping via AMO. That’s not healthy.
- aepiepaey 7y ago
  > This tool binary-patches your local system rather than shipping via AMO. That’s not healthy. Modifying/creating/updating a few text files in your profile directory is not "binary-patching". And it's done this way because it's impossible to do it with only a WebExtension published on AMO.
  - floatingatoll 7y ago
    > Modifying/creating/updating a few text files in your profile directory is not "binary-patching". Correction #1: "This binary tool patches" Predicted reply: "It's a shell script, not a binary" Correction #2: "This executable tool patches" Predicted reply: "It doesn't patch Firefox, it just alters your Firefox profile" Correction #3: "This executable tool alters your profile" Predicted reply: "Shell scripts aren't executables" Correction #4: "This arbitrary code alters your profile" Predicted reply: "It just adds a theme that AMO won't allow!" And so, having nitpicked that to death to save us death by nested replies, I'm going to focus on your second sentence: > it's done this way because it's impossible to do it with only a WebExtension published on AMO. Correct. My point is that you can get lots of HN readers to do completely unsafe things — like allow a shell script to make modifications to their Firefox profile — by phrasing it as something appealing, like 'dark mode'. This modification is, by nature of being a command-line profile modification, horrendously unsafe. It makes a case for why Apple is now implementing kernel-level restrictions for read/write access to ~/Library/Mail, ~/Photos, and so forth — because sooner or later someone will run something that unexpectedly demands access to something it shouldn't have, and the user will be given a chance to deny it. After I upgraded to Catalina beta, Dropbox tried to access my ~/Desktop folder. Why? I only use ~/Dropbox. I denied it access. I wish I could have the same "permission dialog required" approach applied to ~/Library/Application Support/Firefox, so that nothing but Firefox and tools I explicitly authorize can edit my profile. Until that day, people will continue running things like this, thinking that they're somehow safe, without any warning from the Firefox team that "Granting this access could allow malicious software to intercept your communications and steal your credentials", which this dark mode thing very much could if someday the author of this "shell script" decides to make it do so.
laythea 7y ago
It's just a theme. Why the drama?
- smitty1e 7y ago
  Security?
einr 7y ago
I remember when operating systems had color themes and all applications magically adhered to the user settings because they used OS toolkits to draw their user interfaces. It is 2019 and now we get to download a 7.5 megabyte untrusted binary blob that does who knows what to our system in order to patch one application with some rando's idea of a good dark theme. Pray it doesn't break the next time Firefox force-updates your shit. Sigh.
rangibaby 7y ago
Firefox Developer Editon comes with a dark theme too: https://wiki.mozilla.org/DevTools/Developer_Edition_Theme https://wiki.mozilla.org/DevTools/Developer_Edition_Theme
- JohnTHaller 7y ago
  Standard Firefox has a dark theme built right in. Select Menu - Customize. There's Default, Light, and Dark. And 3 densities for the UI.
boblebricoleur 7y ago
Above security concerns, I'm worried about installing a custom theme made by someone who would choose such difficult to read color pairing for their own website.

67 points by jhabdas 7y ago

hprotagonist 7y ago

A firefox theme i need to brew install just feels ... weird. Is there no other way to do this?

grenoire 7y ago
Theming Firefox requires some funky file location detection; ShadowFox does that by executables, which is a little distressing. GitHub project also includes the sources to the distributables, as far as I recall.
lunchables 7y ago
Not sure if it has as much coverage, but this was a new one to me that I plan on trying out: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20390261 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20390261

immigrantsheep 7y ago

Why not use the official Firefox Color to change your theme? Doesn't need a separate installer. https://color.firefox.com/ https://color.firefox.com/

bgeeek 7y ago
Quite like Solarized themes, so have one that switches from light to dark and vice versa.
oakslab 7y ago
I'm using plata theme[1]. The only limitation is that FF Color doesn't apply to about:* pages, whereas SF does. I seldom change my settings anyway, so it's not an issue. [1]: https://gitlab.com/tista500/plata-theme#extra-browser-support https://gitlab.com/tista500/plata-theme#extra-browser-suppor...
pvinis 7y ago
I'm in love with color.firefox.com since it was out! So good.
krilly 7y ago
Or just write a userChrome.css and dump it in your profile directory. /r/firefoxCSS has the details
- inops 7y ago
  userChrome.css support will be disabled by default in Firefox 69.[1][2] The user must toggle the "toolkit.legacyUserProfileCustomizations.stylesheet" preference to enable that. Based on the name of that preference, as well as this developer page[3] saying "Support for the userChrome.css file and any of its elements described below are not guaranteed in future versions of Firefox", it seems likely userChrome.css will be dropped in the future. [1] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1541233 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1541233 [2] https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/69.0beta/releasenotes/ https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/69.0beta/releasenotes/ [3] https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Tech/XUL/Tutorial/Modifying_the_Default_Skin https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Tech/XUL/Tu...
  - wlesieutre 7y ago
    That's a bummer, AFAIK it's still required in order to disable to top tab bar row for use with Tree Style Tab or similar. https://hackernoon.com/firefox-hide-tabs-6e1f6cf63d95 https://hackernoon.com/firefox-hide-tabs-6e1f6cf63d95

subbz 7y ago

What's the advantage over the standard dark Firefox theme?

cerberusss 7y ago
ShadowFox covers all corner cases. For instance, when opening a new tab, Firefox would flash a crazy huge white page before theming it.
- sleavey 7y ago
  Seems like this should be fixed in Firefox rather than requiring a theme which executes unsandboxed code on your machine to install itself. I get that people probably want this now, but personally if this bothered me I'd submit a feature request and wait for something more official.
- baal80spam 7y ago
  >For instance, when opening a new tab, Firefox would flash a crazy huge white page before theming it. I'm using a standard FF dark theme and I don't see anything like that. That's on Win7, FF 67.0.4 (64-bit).
  - remedan 7y ago
    I think this issue was fixed. But it definitely used to exist. I used to use ShadowFox specifically because of it.
  - deleted 7y ago
    [deleted]
  - cerberusss 7y ago
    On Mac, latest version, it still exists for new window and second new tab. Subsequent new tabs seem to be fixed.
- addicted 7y ago
  I remember this issue but I haven’t seen it lately. Maybe they’ve fixed it?

Krasnol 7y ago

I wish it would leave some sign of it's existence in Firefox. In a few months I wont remember how I did that...

echohack5 7y ago
I've run into this problem with all sorts of little things on my Mac, so I use this to automate all those little things I tend to forget about! You're welcome to use it / star / fork. https://github.com/echohack/macbot https://github.com/echohack/macbot
- Krasnol 7y ago
  No Mac here but thanks for trying :)

MaXtreeM 7y ago

Has anyone found working full dark theme for Firefox mobile on Android? I've tried several available through the standard addons page but they all seem to just change the top bar to some grayish background. I guess the API for change the Side Drop-Down Menu and Settings are not exposed?

piotrkubisa 7y ago
The new preview version of Firefox is completely dark.
- huxflux 7y ago
  Link?A
  - piotrkubisa 7y ago
    Blog post: https://blog.mozilla.org/futurereleases/2019/06/27/reinventing-firefox-for-android-a-preview/ https://blog.mozilla.org/futurereleases/2019/06/27/reinventi... GooglePlay: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=org.mozilla.fenix&hl=en_US https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=org.mozilla.fe... Some screenshots with dark theme: https://www.xda-developers.com/mozilla-transition-users-from-firefox-to-fenix/ https://www.xda-developers.com/mozilla-transition-users-from...
pz64 7y ago
im using darkreader which i think , work great

floatingatoll 7y ago

How to spear phish HN readers: 1) Convince them to install crapware* into their browser using basic-but-real functionality. Useful keywords: vi, solarized, dark mode, ad blocker. 2) Wait one month. 3) Ship your C&C backdoor via whatever autoupdate mechanism you put into place and see who phones home. * This tool binary-patches your local system rather than shipping via AMO. That’s not healthy.

aepiepaey 7y ago
> This tool binary-patches your local system rather than shipping via AMO. That’s not healthy. Modifying/creating/updating a few text files in your profile directory is not "binary-patching". And it's done this way because it's impossible to do it with only a WebExtension published on AMO.
- floatingatoll 7y ago
  > Modifying/creating/updating a few text files in your profile directory is not "binary-patching". Correction #1: "This binary tool patches" Predicted reply: "It's a shell script, not a binary" Correction #2: "This executable tool patches" Predicted reply: "It doesn't patch Firefox, it just alters your Firefox profile" Correction #3: "This executable tool alters your profile" Predicted reply: "Shell scripts aren't executables" Correction #4: "This arbitrary code alters your profile" Predicted reply: "It just adds a theme that AMO won't allow!" And so, having nitpicked that to death to save us death by nested replies, I'm going to focus on your second sentence: > it's done this way because it's impossible to do it with only a WebExtension published on AMO. Correct. My point is that you can get lots of HN readers to do completely unsafe things — like allow a shell script to make modifications to their Firefox profile — by phrasing it as something appealing, like 'dark mode'. This modification is, by nature of being a command-line profile modification, horrendously unsafe. It makes a case for why Apple is now implementing kernel-level restrictions for read/write access to ~/Library/Mail, ~/Photos, and so forth — because sooner or later someone will run something that unexpectedly demands access to something it shouldn't have, and the user will be given a chance to deny it. After I upgraded to Catalina beta, Dropbox tried to access my ~/Desktop folder. Why? I only use ~/Dropbox. I denied it access. I wish I could have the same "permission dialog required" approach applied to ~/Library/Application Support/Firefox, so that nothing but Firefox and tools I explicitly authorize can edit my profile. Until that day, people will continue running things like this, thinking that they're somehow safe, without any warning from the Firefox team that "Granting this access could allow malicious software to intercept your communications and steal your credentials", which this dark mode thing very much could if someday the author of this "shell script" decides to make it do so.

laythea 7y ago

It's just a theme. Why the drama?

smitty1e 7y ago
Security?

einr 7y ago

I remember when operating systems had color themes and all applications magically adhered to the user settings because they used OS toolkits to draw their user interfaces. It is 2019 and now we get to download a 7.5 megabyte untrusted binary blob that does who knows what to our system in order to patch one application with some rando's idea of a good dark theme. Pray it doesn't break the next time Firefox force-updates your shit. Sigh.

rangibaby 7y ago

Firefox Developer Editon comes with a dark theme too: https://wiki.mozilla.org/DevTools/Developer_Edition_Theme https://wiki.mozilla.org/DevTools/Developer_Edition_Theme

JohnTHaller 7y ago
Standard Firefox has a dark theme built right in. Select Menu - Customize. There's Default, Light, and Dark. And 3 densities for the UI.

boblebricoleur 7y ago

Above security concerns, I'm worried about installing a custom theme made by someone who would choose such difficult to read color pairing for their own website.