If you're going to be pedantic enough to mention the 2 byte signature, I think you need to be more precise than '1% more impressive' when its less than 0.5% len

If you're going to be pedantic enough to mention the 2 byte signature, I think you need to be more precise than '1% more impressive' when its less than 0.5% length differential. Or are you suggesting a non linear relationship between size and impressiveness??? I suppose a 1 byte pacman would be more than 100% more impressive, so that fits?