4 ms·
This is essentially blog-spam. The WSJ link they provide in the source has a lot more information: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704774604576035
by ahlatimer 16y ago
This is essentially blog-spam. The WSJ link they provide in the source has a lot more information: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704774604576035500936272100.html?mod=rss_whats_news_technology http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142405274870477460457603...
- kondro 16y agoWell, not my blog and I don't subscribe to the WSJ because most of the articles don't really relate to me. After reading the WSJ article, I find that just because it is longer doesn't mean it provides me with any more useful information that the Engadget summary. I think I will stick with Engadget still, but everyone is entitled to their own opinion.