3 ms·
The problem with starting off in-house and then employing remote workers as an afterthought is that it creates a perception-based inequality between the two cam
by pyang6641 7y ago
The problem with starting off in-house and then employing remote workers as an afterthought is that it creates a perception-based inequality between the two camps. Like the CEO of AngelList said, the primary reason remote workers at large companies decide to return back to their offices (as you've stated) is that the status quo there is to be at the office. You can read the article here if you're interested: https://angel.co/blog/why-naval-ravikant-thinks-remote-work-is-the-future https://angel.co/blog/why-naval-ravikant-thinks-remote-work-....
- bwb 7y agoGreat point, I've seen remote fail so many times because it is 10x harder if some people are in an office and some people are remote. That doesn't work IMO. Maybe if you have a division that is 100% remote that could work, but the mixed model just doesn't work from what I've seen.