but does the fact that water transferred the state of being wet to a separate entity necessarily imply that wetness is an attribute that water possesses? as far

but does the fact that water transferred the state of being wet to a separate entity necessarily imply that wetness is an attribute that water possesses? as far as i can tell, something only becomes wet when water (or a liquid in general) is applied to it, and while i suppose you could make the argument that a liquid at an atomic level is constantly applying itself to itself, but i think that would be a painfully pedantic argument and also a straw man because you probably wouldn't make that argument at all. tl;dr wet is a state that is dependent on the application of liquid, not necessarily an attribute of the liquid itself