The way this article is written I feel like I'm being conned while reading it. It's basically repeating the same thing for 90% of the article; talking about the

The way this article is written I feel like I'm being conned while reading it. It's basically repeating the same thing for 90% of the article; talking about the spanish prisoner movie. Nothing about why zuckerberg is 'running a con' or what the con even is. Then at the end of it, I'm supposed to believe that the con is the fact that libra, while potentially facilitating ecommerce and being generally a good thing, is going to kill bitcoin. Why is that a bad thing? If it's better at ecommerce than bitcoin is, then bitcoin deserves to die. It's not insidious to win at something if it's better. I don't even know if I agree that Libra is a good thing, but the conclusions drawn here don't make any sense.