4 ms·
Spending down your warchest to pay manufacturers to use your chips isn't something that even Intel can keep up forever. If AMD had kept up their performance le
by Symmetry 7y ago
Spending down your warchest to pay manufacturers to use your chips isn't something that even Intel can keep up forever. If AMD had kept up their performance lead eventually Intel wouldn't have been able to keep up its kickbacks.
- dralley 7y ago> If AMD had kept up their performance lead eventually Intel wouldn't have been able to keep up its kickbacks. That's hard to do when your R&D budget is shattered. Intel was fined for far less money than they caused damage to AMD.
- TheOperator 7y agoIntel doesn't need to do it forever. They need to hold out for Intel 7nm slated for 2021 and they need 7nm to be good. From a zero sum monopolist perspective it makes a lot of sense for Intel to be hamstringing AMD here. What Intel needs to be careful about is while they fend off AMDs attacks in desktop/server also need to keep an eye on ARM coming after them on mobile. How long until Linux based Chromebooks come with Qualcomm CPUs like 7cx become standard? The chips are better than Intels low TDP offerings so long as they don't have to emulate x86_64. They could spend all their money on a phyrric victory crushing AMD only to lose a different market. It's a tough job being king with upstarts always after your neck.