3 ms·
The concern with winlink is twofold: 1) It transmits without checking if the frequency is already in use, and is thus a source of interference to other users
by sciurus 7y ago
The concern with winlink is twofold:
1) It transmits without checking if the frequency is already in use, and is thus a source of interference to other users
2) It uses a proprietary protocol that requires purchasing expensive hardware froma single company (https://www.p4dragon.com/download/SCS_Pricelist_2019_REV-A.pdf https://www.p4dragon.com/download/SCS_Pricelist_2019_REV-A.p...) to decode
The solutions proposed are
1) Limit "Automatically Controlled Data Stations" like Winlink to a specific range of frequencies
2) Limit the protocols they use to ones that "can be be monitored, in it’s entirety, by 3rd parties, with freely available open source software"
You can read the petition at https://ecfsapi.fcc.gov/file/100918881206/PETITION%20FOR%20RULEMAKING.pdf https://ecfsapi.fcc.gov/file/100918881206/PETITION%20FOR%20R... for more details.
- sjoerger 7y agoWhile Winlink can use the Pactor protocol, it is not required to use the system. Winlink is capable of using multiple protocols each of which fit to frequency, hardware and band conditions. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winlink#Technical_protocols https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winlink#Technical_protocols