3 ms·

Of course I wasn't suggesting that we should all give up and live in caves or something. It's not a binary choice. I refuse to believe that the way our world, s

Of course I wasn't suggesting that we should all give up and live in caves or something. It's not a binary choice. I refuse to believe that the way our world, society, and lives currently work is the best it could possibly be, because it seriously sucks. There's got to be a way to improve and simplify the system incrementally. Also, I dispute the idea that simpler societies have lower absolute quality of life in every way. Having lived part of my life with an isolated tribal society, there are definitely pros and cons. (A close knit community is one huge pro that I really really miss.) Instead of a blind "our complex systems are better just because they are" I think we should step back and take actual stock of the costs and rewards and really ask ourselves, for each individual thing, whether it's worth it.

jmcqk6 7y ago
>Also, I dispute the idea that simpler societies have lower absolute quality of life in every way. I didn't argue this. I only argued that our ancestors didn't live as long on average as we did. Nor did I argue that the way things currently are is the best it could possibly be. I think there is a way for us to improve incrementally, and in some cases that means simplification. But if that simplification does not respect the root causes for the initial complexity, the resulting system will be just as flawed as the current system. That is my point. Complexity is a symptom of the underlying system, and to try to address complexity on it's own without the underlying causes for that complexity will just lead to more pain in the future.