There are many ways to pose a challenge. > I don’t think of challenge as conflict Agree, but I like to think of it as retrofixing your reasoning for the diffe

There are many ways to pose a challenge. > I don’t think of challenge as conflict Agree, but I like to think of it as retrofixing your reasoning for the different view: "You tell me A, but I used to believe B because of C, D, etc. Can we investigate whether my reasoning was lacking, those are also in conflict with A, A and B are not actually in conflict, or B has a validity not influenced by A"