3 ms·

There is no logical coherence to this statement. Just because there have been proponents of both sides of a debate for many years doesn't mean that a new argume

There is no logical coherence to this statement. Just because there have been proponents of both sides of a debate for many years doesn't mean that a new argument is invalid.

deleted 7y ago
[deleted]
sureaboutthis 7y ago
Not every new argument, decades later, is valid either and this is a dim witted one. As made up on the spot as they come.
- AlEinstein 7y ago
  But you still haven't said what's dim witted about it.
  - sureaboutthis 7y ago
    I did.
    - afiori 7y ago
      I believe you refer to the "real" in the title as meaning "historically correct". If that is the case it is a silly argument. Real can also mean "having relevant effect in practice"
- dang 7y ago
  We've banned this account for repeatedly violating the site guidelines ignoring our request to stop. I held off as long as I could, but this is egregious. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html