3 ms·
EDIT: guidelines As a note, I think there are probably better crypto technologies these days, but none of them do what pgp aimed to do, but rather we have a bu
by mbrumlow 7y ago
EDIT: guidelines
As a note, I think there are probably better crypto technologies these days, but none of them do what pgp aimed to do, but rather we have a bunch of smaller tools that do small parts that pgp did. I am not going to send you a singed file over singal, and I think it is silly to have to use a alternative means of sending the file that will either remove the ability for authenticity, or require me to do the authentication dance again with you.
PGP suffers from bad tooling, and further suffers from the relentless onslaught of people who want fancy electron or phone apps that can only do a small % of what pgp would allow.
Final note, I think something better than PGP could exist, but nobody has made it yet. In either case, validating keys will always be a hard problem and any attempt to automate it will result in false sense of security. While end to end encryption will keep on lookers from viewing your communications -- you just might find out one day you are talking directly to the people you were trying to hind your communication from.
- tptacek 7y agoFirst, the guidelines ask you not to talk about downvotes. You can find out more about that by reading the guidelines. Secondly, Signal sends files just fine, and does so more securely than GPG. If you don't want to use Signal to do that, you can also use Magic Wormhole, which also works better and is more secure than PGP.