3 ms·
To your last point, > Maybe the current "implementation" is compatible but not with the specs itself. It's perhaps worth noting that this is a "preliminary sp
by Fripplebubby 7y ago
To your last point,
> Maybe the current "implementation" is compatible but not with the specs itself.
It's perhaps worth noting that this is a "preliminary specification" and an extension of HLS. HLS itself is an IETF standard (well - an "Internet Draft"): https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-pantos-http-live-streaming-23 https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-pantos-http-live-streaming...
- TD-Linux 7y agoIt is not an IETF standard - those have RFC numbers. It is just a personal draft - any IETF member can upload one of those, regardless if it's useful. I'm happy that it has a specification - but it's just a one-man project, not something that has gone through the IETF standards process.
- lultimouomo 7y agoA couple of years ago it finally was published as an RFC: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8216 https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8216