What of this: Dahua at first ignored ReFirm’s inquiries, then claimed the vulnerability was a simple error that had been fixed in the latest update. But when R

What of this: Dahua at first ignored ReFirm’s inquiries, then claimed the vulnerability was a simple error that had been fixed in the latest update. But when ReFirm looked through the updated firmware, they still found the same backdoor — just relocated in a different place in the code. (Huawei had done the same thing).