3 ms·
I agree that CCL and SBCL are superb on Linux and Mac. But until at least a few years ago, they were both poorly supported on Windows (requiring something like
by AgentOrange1234 7y ago
I agree that CCL and SBCL are superb on Linux and Mac. But until at least a few years ago, they were both poorly supported on Windows (requiring something like Cygwin). That may have changed now. Also, AFAIK, CCL is dying now. :(
- fiddlerwoaroof 7y agoCCL's development is relatively slow compared to sbcl, but I'm not sure that it's "dying". And, there's been a brand new compiler on LLVM, clasp, as well as the SICL project.
- flavio81 7y ago>AFAIK, CCL is dying now CCL is the 2nd most downloaded Lisp implementation, so it can't be called "dying." You'll find that new lisp projects are almost invariably tested on CCL too.
- AgentOrange1234 7y agoThe latest commit is 2 months ago.[1] I don’t know how to define “dying,” but it doesn’t seem healthy. It saddens me, as it is/was a great tool for me for many years. I hope SBCL can take it from here. 1. https://github.com/Clozure/ccl https://github.com/Clozure/ccl