3 ms·
But as far as I can tell, the Emacs daemon shouldn't be a blocking dependency. Here's the systemd unit definition I would have been using at the time: https://w
by _emacsomancer_ 7y ago
But as far as I can tell, the Emacs daemon shouldn't be a blocking dependency. Here's the systemd unit definition I would have been using at the time: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php?title=Emacs&oldid=469589#As_a_systemd_unit https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php?title=Emacs&oldid=46958... . And here's a more recent one: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Emacs#As_a_systemd_unit https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Emacs#As_a_systemd_unit . Neither of these should be blocking dependencies, should they? `WantedBy=default.target` doesn't make it blocking, does it?
Is there something more that should be added to these sorts of unit definitions to improve graceful failure scenarios in systemd?
- PlutoIsAPlanet 7y agoI think it might, this really just sounds like a misconfigured unit. in which case systemd is doing exactly as it's told. Edit: That linked unit is for user level systemd, so it shouldn't be involved in the system boot at all.
- _emacsomancer_ 7y agoIt definitely is/was a user-level unit, which makes it unclear to me why it should have interfered with bringing up other services in general.