>Yeah, Emacs follows UNIX philosophy only in the edge case of "doing one thing" being doing everything that's even tangentially related to or representable as t

>Yeah, Emacs follows UNIX philosophy only in the edge case of "doing one thing" being doing everything that's even tangentially related to or representable as tex. I think that is the right idea, but it can be reworded to: >Yeah, Emacs follows UNIX philosophy only in the case of "doing one thing" by being an interactive, turing complete, generic text processor.