2 ms·
I'd like to see the type signature of that `_` construct. It seems to me like the bind operator would've made the extra complexity unnecessary.
by spion 7y ago
I'd like to see the type signature of that `_` construct.
It seems to me like the bind operator would've made the extra complexity unnecessary.
- ulucs 7y ago_.map is basically syntatic sugar for p => p.map, only written with today's javascript capabilities. I just tried to implement the proposed #. Dynamic access to methods doesn't yield very nice type signatures.