4 ms·

Interesting that the author thought it would take too long to write about lambda functions

• redsymbol 16y ago
  I really just ran out of time :) Had intended to go back and add that someday, but never did. In retrospect, I think it's fine the way it is - whoever reads that article will have a good foundation for actually using lambdas, which will be easy enough for them to learn about in other ways (if their language of choice even supports lambdas).
  • Herring 16y ago
    You can still add it! For completeness. That's the clearest writing I've seen in a long time.
    • redsymbol 16y ago
      Thanks for the compliment :)
• eru 16y ago
  Lambdas aren't that interesting after all. I wouldn't call it 'lambda functions', but just 'lambda notation'. Having to name your functions is a inconvenience at most.