3 ms·

Interesting answer. The people aiming for a certain position or role mostly care about similar things though. So don't they play a zero sum game ?

• closeparen 7y ago
  The most effective person gets hired into a role. The firm performs well, moves more product, lowers prices for customers, sends larger orders to its suppliers, invests some surplus in R&D, grows its payroll, generates return for shareholders who then invest their gains in other enterprises, etc. Or an ineffective person is hired and the opposite happens. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lump_of_labour_fallacy https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lump_of_labour_fallacy
• TTPrograms 7y ago
  If you had two job offers, one salaried at $100,000 and one at $100,001, I assume you would pick $100,001 with zero consideration for any other factors?
• lukejduncan 7y ago
  It assumes there is only one fixed org chart and role. This isn’t true everywhere under all circumstances, but my personal experience in tech has been that companies make space for talented people who have a real impact. If you’re fighting over a title, you’ll stagnate. If you’re growing the business and building useful things roles will invent themselves. Especially in the case of competing with an individual over a role, making each other look good is far more valuable than being competitors.