3 ms·
When you make the decision to live in a rural area, you know that you're giving up a lot of the conveniences that you take for granted when living in a city. F
by notatoad 7y ago
When you make the decision to live in a rural area, you know that you're giving up a lot of the conveniences that you take for granted when living in a city. For most people who live in rural areas, slightly worse cell coverage is a perfectly acceptable tradeoff to not having to deal with the noise, crime, and crowding of cities.
Nobody deserves 5G.
- reaperducer 7y agoWhen you make the decision to live in a rural area, you know that you're giving up a lot of the conveniences that you take for granted when living in a city Are you under the impression that when the stork is delivering babies, it asks them where they want to live? There is a subset of people who choose to live in rural areas. But they are not a majority. And the remainder shouldn't be condescended to as if they made a bad life decision and are being punished for not wanting to live in a city. Nobody deserves 5G I'm not arguing that they do. But there are an awful lot of people in this thread who are OK if 3G and 4G never finish rolling out in rural areas as long as they, themselves, get gigabit 5G connections.
- notatoad 7y ago>there are an awful lot of people in this thread who are OK if 3G and 4G never finish rolling out in rural areas as long as they, themselves, get gigabit 5G connections i think those people are simply not making the false conclusion that we can improve rural coverage by preventing the improvement of urban coverage.