3 ms·
It seems like the bulk of your concern is about the voting specifically. I'm curious if the voting aspect of the credit system were removed and voting worked mo
by thekyle 7y ago
It seems like the bulk of your concern is about the voting specifically. I'm curious if the voting aspect of the credit system were removed and voting worked more like it does on Reddit/HN (one vote per user), but the other aspects of it were left intact would that alleviate most of your concerns?
Specifically, it would still cost credits to leave comments, submit stories and facts, but not to vote.
- alexandercrohde 7y agoI mean, I don't imagine I'd "pay" to leave comments, submit stories, or facts. Maybe I'm an odd-breed but I see HN as a charitable place for those in the know to contribute to the pool of public knowledge. I think the best version of HN (or equivalent) is full of people with that objective (e.g. wikipedia). The worst version is full of people grinding emotional axes (4chan) or self-promoting. I think you'll find the people who are self-promoting (e.g. trying to start a new cryptocurrency, or a PR firm) will have much more resources to submit articles than good-samaritans. The thing I do like is breaking an article into a list of cited facts. I like the brevity, and I like sources.