4 ms·
Yeah that's completely inaccurate. There is a plethora of evidence that suggests this was done with the support of the Russians. From the type of equipment use
by nso 7y ago
Yeah that's completely inaccurate. There is a plethora of evidence that suggests this was done with the support of the Russians.
From the type of equipment used, the position of the launcher, public Twitter publications with bragging about shooting down a plane, phone surveillance, and more.
- emayljames 7y agoAll the info you state comes from NATO/US investigations. So yeah, not biased. On your logic, then what about the trajectory being disputed and simulated to have come from Ukrainian positions. All evidence used from Western sources of investigation. It's not who shouts loudest is the innocent party.
- verdverm 7y agoWhere do you get your info from?
- Arnt 7y agoUhm.... What evidence would count as unbiased by your standards? I ask because I wonder whether such evidence could realistically exist. You sound as if your requirement is data collected by someone who really, absolutely has no interest in the conflict, but still cares enough to cover the area with radar or similar.