> Yet another article framing dystopian levels of surveillance as only bad if they malfunction Seriously, it's amazing how well framing a conversation works to

> Yet another article framing dystopian levels of surveillance as only bad if they malfunction Seriously, it's amazing how well framing a conversation works to divert it. Where are all the comments about the stasi, securing databases, corrupt law enforcement, and not collecting information in the first place? Instead we're arguing over what percentage of "innocent" people can be hassled by the total surveillance state for it to be acceptable.