3 ms·
The upper bound is going to change with the material, because the quality is most fragile at high frequencies - the place where the most data is needed. Speech
by chipsy 16y ago
The upper bound is going to change with the material, because the quality is most fragile at high frequencies - the place where the most data is needed. Speech uses a different frequency range from distorted guitar, and a different range from a synthesized bass tone. When you hear the metallic-swirl artifacts in low bitrate MP3s, it's always coming from the highs of cymbals and electric guitars.
With the lower bound recommendation, they are guaranteeing that you will affect _any_ material by going below 32kbps, which is a useful piece of data; one can optimize material for size by starting there and gradually moving upwards until the sound is as transparent as necessary.
- DarkShikari 16y agobecause the quality is most fragile at high frequencies - the place where the most data is needed Funnily enough, for CELT, it's largely the opposite: high frequencies cost practically nothing to compress because of CELT's algorithm, whereas low frequencies are the main bandwidth-eater.