What does it say about the, um, rigor of the writing and editing of this piece that the author goes on about differing with Bruce Sterling's assessment, says it

What does it say about the, um, rigor of the writing and editing of this piece that the author goes on about differing with Bruce Sterling's assessment, says it is "important to read" -- and doesn't provide a link to the essay in question? Feh. Here's that missing link: <http://www.webstock.org.nz/blog/2010/the-blast-shack/&#62 http://www.webstock.org.nz/blog/2010/the-blast-shack/>