3 ms·
Doesn't SpaceX sidestep a bunch of this stuff by achieving reliability via redundancy instead? Like, put three valves in series when it needs to fail closed, an
by mikepurvis 7y ago
Doesn't SpaceX sidestep a bunch of this stuff by achieving reliability via redundancy instead? Like, put three valves in series when it needs to fail closed, and three in parallel when it need to fail open, that kind of thing.
I wonder if there's potential for a similar approach here?
- NegativeK 7y agoA rocket total failure has a more obvious, bounded cost that's lower than a reactor failure.