3 ms·
Bad idea. If you did that you could end up paying back the money twice, once for your own payment and another for paypal's own refund.
by joosters 7y ago
Bad idea. If you did that you could end up paying back the money twice, once for your own payment and another for paypal's own refund.
- FDSGSG 7y agoThis is incorrect and not how paypal handles refunds. This is merchant 101: always refund suspicious payments before your payment processor has to do it, it'd be really bizarre if Paypal was somehow the only exception in the industry.
- dzader 7y agolol couldn't possibly be worse advice in this thread. 100% do not listen to this and NEVER refund the transfer
- FDSGSG 7y agoWhy not? The only way I see this going wrong is if instead of doing a refund you create a new transfer to send the money back, but you obviously shouldn't do that.
- dzader 7y agoah sorry I always equate PayPal to venmo - there might be a valid way to refund on PayPal but certainly not venmo
- thekyle 7y agoFDSGSG is absolutely correct. He should have immediately processed a refund on the $600 as soon as he saw the transaction. By not doing so he risked getting a chargeback and loosing not only the $600 but an additional $10 PayPal chargeback fee. There is no risk of OP loosing $1,200 to two refunds if he went through the proper refund procedure. A transfer can only ever be refunded once.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- TazeTSchnitzel 7y agoBut PayPal has an option to return a payment, it doesn't have to be you manually sending a transaction back to the person.