4 ms·
It was quite a good case-study in bike-shedding. For those new to the term, it's effectively "The intensity of discussion is inversely proportional to the comp
by bodhi 16y ago
It was quite a good case-study in bike-shedding.
For those new to the term, it's effectively "The intensity of discussion is inversely proportional to the complexity of the problem".
http://ftp.sunet.se/jargon/html/B/bikeshedding.html http://ftp.sunet.se/jargon/html/B/bikeshedding.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parkinsons_Law_of_Triviality http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parkinsons_Law_of_Triviality
- steveklabnik 16y agoI don't know if I'd entirely call it bike-shedding; if they left it as a snowman, people would start to make comments like "Oh those unprofessional Rubyists, putting silly snowmans willy-nilly into code!" Then again, they might not. But a check seems more 'professional.'
- bodhi 16y agoI agree with you on the end result, but I remember following the comments and discussion on GitHub when the changes were being made. It sure seemed like a big discussion over not much across several commits, and more thank 50 comments on GitHub alone.
- steveklabnik 16y agoYeah, I saw nothing of that, so... you may certainly well be right.