3 ms·

Uk-ISP-group-names-mozilla-internet-villain-for-supporting-DNS-over-HTTPS/

• kadira 7y ago
  Won't somebody think of the children
• Nextgrid 7y ago
  If a stupid government or telco cartel doesn’t like something then it means it’s most likely good. Kudos to Mozilla & Google for implementing this, although I wish it was a separate protocol rather than abusing HTTPS.
• londons_explore 7y ago
  ISP's are salty that DoH will force them to buy expensive filtering kit that actually scans every packet rather than their current setup of a few lines in named.conf on their DNS servers. Said expensive filtering kit would force many ISP's to reorganize their network architecture, because many don't have a single physical location that all traffic is routed via.
• zaarn 7y ago
  "Several companies that sell censorship & filtering release a press statement that Mozilla is bad for not enabling them"
• TadaScientist 7y ago
  So if I use a VPN plus Mozilla with this setting switched on I should be good to go? Are there any actual guides on protecting your privacy online and eliminating filters? Preventing tracking and fingerprinting is already feasible with a combination of ublock origin and noscript for mozilla. Also, what about linux?
• deleted 7y ago
  [deleted]