I never said BTC was superior, in any way, in any form. I never said BTC was a replacement for USD. I never said BTC was going to replace any fiat currency. I n

I never said BTC was superior, in any way, in any form. I never said BTC was a replacement for USD. I never said BTC was going to replace any fiat currency. I never said that BTC is suprior than USD for legal purposes. Literally, the only thing I said was that BTC has a use, some people obviously think it has value, and semantically it falls under the definition of invest. How you managed to drag me into an argument about the legality of BTC and how it's superior to USD - all things I never said or claimed - is actually really astonishing. >No, the goal posts are right where you last saw them; your field goal was just blocked. That was one of the funniest things I've read all day (sincerely), so thanks for that. I would just comment that you started with: >You said people were arguing BTC had no use. I’m asking what I can use it for? And ended with >I am saying that USD is strictly superior to BTC for all legitimate/legal use cases. If you want to hide assets or buy cocaine, BTC might be better, sure. But, otherwise it’s like comparing a 1980s computer to one from today. If that's you "blocking", cool. We have different opinions on what the phrase "moving the goal posts" is, I guess. >As for “legal,” you know damn well what it means: can I be prosecuted successfully for what I’m about to do? If not, it’s legal. Laws are different in different countries. What you can be successfully prosecuted in one country for is completely legal in others.