2 ms·
Usually when I'm thinking about domain names I also weight in the marketability factor. Would the domain name potentially make a nice main logo as-is, or would
by Skywing 16y ago
Usually when I'm thinking about domain names I also weight in the marketability factor. Would the domain name potentially make a nice main logo as-is, or would it be kind of bland? In the case of cant and cannot.com, I think I would opt for cannot.com. I can just visualize it at the top of a webpage a little easier than I can with 'cant'. Plus, I think cannot, in this case, rolls off the tongue much easier.
- keiferski 16y agoThat's pretty much why I'm hesitant to do "cant.com". The only issue is that 'cannot' adds another syllable and doesn't sound as...casual; JoeCantDance.com JoeCannotDance.com I get your point about the logo though. That's definitely something worth considering, especially as some (a minor fraction, likely) of my target audience might not realize that typing "can't" into the url bar won't work.